| Audio Tweaks - The Game's a Foot! |
|
|
Black Diamond Racing Pyramid Cones
| (page 2) |
| Setup |
| |
|
For this and the other five footer reviews I will be using my upstairs
system. The CD player is a Cambridge Audio D500SE, the amplification a Classe
CA-101 power amp with directly mounted EVS Ultimate Attenuators for adjusting
volume. The speakers are a pair of Magnepan MMGs and the cabling by
Nordost: Red Dawn interconnects and Flatline Gold MkII speaker cables. The CD
player and amp are on top of the DIY
Rack we built earlier. The rack shelves are pretty good themselves at
controlling vibration so in order to have a more representative shelf I placed a
standard shelf on top of the DIY rack supported only by the tips of the four
rack pillars. A few taps on this shelf nicely confirmed that we now have a
sufficiently resonant platform for our tests. Our primary assessment will be
based on three footers under the CD player, two in front and one in the back.
This arrangement will ensure consistency throughout the footer reviews.
|
 |
Performance |
| |
Usually at this point I would talk about
differences (if any) brought about substituting the standard
feet for these. But having had the BDR cones for some time
now, it was not necessary to go through this formality; I was
very well familiar with the audible benefits brought about
with their use: A definite improvement manifested by an
increase in precision, resolution and smoothness.
Rather than dwelling on their benefit as a device replacing
standard feet, I will focus more on the two versions and in
particular how I perceived the cones in contrast to the Vibrapods.
As suggested by BDR in their product literature I first
obtained the Mk3 version and gave them a try. The Mk3's were
therefore my first stab at these carbon fiber pyramids, and as
it turned out my first stab wasn't necessarily the one that
was most rewarding. Simply put the Mk3's were not my cup of
tea. Despite benefits I discussed above, the Mk3's in my
system and to my ears were a bit soft and somewhat slow. If by
nature they were "warmer" then in my system that
same nature could have made it a bit too warm, verging on
softness and somewhat lack of get up and go. You know, a bit
like when your foot stops tapping and your thoughts start
wondering. The sound was a bit glazed over, a bit mellow. In
comparison to the Mk4's I found the Mk3's a bit less
involving. So off to the dealer I went and got Mk4's. To my
relief these were now what I have expected from them in the
first place. I was now hearing more precision and definition
but also energy and spring to the sound I definitely prefer. |
| |
next page:  |
|
| |
|
|
|