| Audio Tweaks - The Game's a Foot! |
|
|
Racquetballs Sliced In Half
| (page 2) |
Setup |
| |
|
For this and the other five footer reviews I will be using my upstairs
system. The CD player is a Cambridge Audio D500SE, the amplification a Classe
CA-101 power amp with directly mounted EVS Ultimate Attenuators for adjusting
volume. The speakers are a pair of Magnepan MMGs and the cabling by
Nordost: Red Dawn interconnects and Flatline Gold MkII speaker cables. The CD
player and amp are on top of the DIY
Rack we built earlier. The rack shelves are pretty good themselves at
controlling vibration so in order to have a more representative shelf I placed a
standard shelf on top of the DIY rack supported only by the tips of the four
rack pillars. A few taps on this shelf nicely confirmed that we now have a
sufficiently resonant platform for our tests. Our primary assessment will be
based on three footers under the CD player, two in front and one in the back.
This arrangement will ensure consistency throughout the footer reviews.
|
 |
|
Performance |
| |
The very first thing I tried with these
racquetball halves was to place one on my desk and put my
hand over it with the opening upwards and covering my hand. I
was surprised to feel very little vibration when I tapped my
desk. It appears the halves were doing a fair job of
"taming" desk born vibration, which was a promising
sign of results to come.
I first listened without the racquetball halves in place, just the CD
player on top of the shelf arrangement I discussed above. Much
of what I like about this system could be heard without any
footers in place. Good dimensionality, acceptable focus, good
dynamics and fair amounts of detail. However the sound was a bit rough in
the treble and had some strain in the mid. |
 |
I placed the racquetball halves under the CD player, two in
front and one in the back and replayed the track(s). Yes,
there was
an improvement but to be honest, not a stellar one. There was a
subtle but noticeable increase in resolution, focus was a bit
tighter and the highs were a bit less splashy. Reading back my
notes I took during my audition, I
noticed I had underlined a phrase, which read: Less edgy.
And yes the sound was a bit more relaxed - not dull but easier
to comprehend. Removing the racquetball halves I confirmed
that the sound was a bit more boomy and somewhat more defused
as compared to when they were in place. My impression
therefore was positive if not overwhelming. Which is about
right for a tweak of this type.
|
Conclusion |
| |
Despite an overall slight improvement, my
expectations from this tweak were somewhat higher than actually realized. I guess the improvement was a
bit more subtle then I would have wished for, or perhaps the
interaction between my player/system and this tweak wasn't
that beneficial. Nevertheless, if you have no other footer or
vibration control device in place - this alternative is a Best
Buy. It's worth a try simply because of its simplicity and affordability.
It costs next to nothing and is definitely better than those
plastic feet so many players are equipped with nowadays.
If you would like to comment on this tweak or suggest
improvements to it, please click here. |
|
|
| |
| Comments
(add) |
| |
|
| Paul |
Hi
Make sure you have one ball directly under the motor
spinning the CD and another directly under the
transformer not so much as in the symetric corners of
the unit. You want to damp vibrations generated by the
unit such as by the spinning of the CD or if the
transformer hums, vibrates. Use other balls to balance
the unit so it doesn't tip over.
This is true for points or other " feet".
Always apply them on the hot spots not on the
geographic corners of the unit by default.
good luck.
Paul
|
| |
|
| Boris |
Good tip
Paul!
I've made similar recommendations in my other footer
reviews.
|
| |
|
| Peter |
Fill the half balls with
Blu Tac. Vast improvement over empty balls only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|